Become a Premium Member | Only $2 a month

► You're making sure we survive
► Exclusive previews
► No more ads





Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.


Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]

Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
1 to 10

MPAA Rating: PG

Shot at various Star Trek conventions throughout the country, this documentary features the stars and fans of the series. With Denise Crosby, Frank D'Amico, Majel Barrett, Brannon Braga, LeVar Burton, James Doohan, Michael Dorn, Jonathan Frakes, DeForest Kelley, Walter Koenig, Gabriel Koerner, Kate Mulgrew, Anne Murphy, Nichelle Nichols, Leonard Nimoy, Ethan Phillips, William Shatner, Brent Spiner, George Takei, Jeri Taylor, Deborah Warner, Wil Wheaton, Grace Lee Whitney and John de Lancie. [1:28]

SEX/NUDITY 2 - Some sexual innuendo (including references to S&M and condoms). We see some photographs and illustrations of couples embracing each other (the woman is sometimes scantily clad). Some women wear cleavage-revealing costumes, a female action-figure is dressed in an S&M outfit and a statue of a nude woman is seen as a lamp base.

VIOLENCE/GORE 1 - A woman slaps a man, supposedly demonstrating a mating ritual.

PROFANITY 0 - Some apparently profane words are bleeped out, so we don't hear them. [profanity glossary]

DISCUSSION TOPICS - Star Trek series and stars, fanaticism, obsession, homosexuality (a brief reference), marijuana (a brief reference).

MESSAGE - Star Trek fans are interesting, but rather obsessive.

Special Keywords: S2 - V1 - P0 - MPAAPG

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member

A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.

INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do



Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.


Tell all your friends: Please recommend to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.


Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.

Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.