|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicole Kidman stars as a woman who won't let anything stand
in the way of her career -- including her husband.
SEX/NUDITY 6 - A woman dances suggestively with a man, and we see glimpses
of her panties -- there are a couple of other scenes which exposed underwear. We see a man
and woman having sex nude but it's hard to see much because the scenes are short and the
camera is far away from them; a young girl hears moaning as the couple has sex. There's
another sex scene where both participants are standing up and they are clothed. There are
many sexual references, some of which are obscene. A woman performs oral sex on a man, and
we hear him moaning. One implied scene of masturbation.
VIOLENCE/GORE 3 - We see a man's head in a small pool of blood, some yelling
and a couple head slaps. A man is hit in the head with a lamp and begs for his life and
then we hear a gunshot as he's shot dead. We see a woman's dead body under ice.
PROFANITY 6 - 13 F-words (with one finger gesture and one in print), some
scatological references, some mild obscenities, some anatomical references. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Ambition, the media.
MESSAGE - There are things you shouldn't do -- even for love.
|
|
Special Keywords: S6 - V3 - P6 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|
