|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A family gets more than they bargained for when they adopt
a daughter -- and her felonious parents want her back.
SEX/NUDITY 4 - A man briefly fondles a woman's bra-clad breasts. A couple
has sex in an extended scene: they moan, they thrust and they talk sexy; he kisses her
body and we see chests and torsos and glimpses of the sides of her breasts.
VIOLENCE/GORE 6 - A child hits, punches and bites and has to be restrained.
A man kills a couple by swinging a golf club at them (we only see the swing). A man breaks
a woman's neck. A man is shot in the arm (some blood). A man beats up a police officer
resulting in blood on the officer's face, and he then slits his throat, off camera. A
man's eye is put out (we see his bloody face and closed, red eye). A man is stabbed in the
stomach (we see blood), and whacked in the head with a 2X4; blood splatters. A man finds
blood in a child's bed. A woman holds a baby and threatens to squeeze its soft spot. A few
fistfights.
PROFANITY 5 - About 7 F-words, a few scatological references, and some
milder obscenities. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Adoption, losing your child, biological vs. adoptive parents.
MESSAGE - Being a parent doesn't mean just giving birth; some people just
shouldn't be parents.
|
|
Special Keywords: S4 - V6 - P5 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|