Become a Premium Member | Only $2 a month

► You're making sure we survive
► Exclusive previews
► No more ads


The Temp



Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.


Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]

Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
1 to 10

MPAA Rating: R

Timothy Hutton and Lara Flynn Boyle star in a thriller about a temp that wants to make it to the top of the corporate world -- and will do anything to reach her goal, even if that includes murder.

SEX/NUDITY 3 - There are a few sexual comments, and we see Boyle dressed in a negligee (all that is apparent is cleavage). Boyle is briefly glimpsed lying on a bed in a darkened room, while writhing and groaning. Masturbation is suggested.

VIOLENCE/GORE 7 - A man gets his hand caught in a shredder and we see a great deal of blood spray his face, a dead man's splotched, discolored face is shown, a corpse is shown hanging, two people eat cookies and bleed from the mouth -- with one person briefly spewing blood on the other -- a security guard is shown with a knife in his bloody chest, two fistfights with no blood, two people are hit in the head with a steel pipe resulting in blood, and a woman falls to her death, but no blood is shown.

PROFANITY 5 - Eight F-words, and other more minor obscenities. [profanity glossary]

DISCUSSION TOPICS - Murder, marital separation, using sex to get ahead at work, deceit and betrayal.

MESSAGE - The corporate world is dog eat dog and some people will do anything to get ahead. The good guy does win in the end.

Special Keywords: S3 - V7 - P5 - MPAAR

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member

A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.

INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do



Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.


Tell all your friends: Please recommend to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.


Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.

Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.