|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Turtles go back in time to medieval Japan, where they
help rebels against a local warlord and a European gun-runner.
SEX/NUDITY 1 - One big kiss (no turtles are involved).
VIOLENCE/GORE 5 - Despite its kid appeal, this installment has a complex
plot and is filmed in a dark and ominous tone. Some violent scenes are rather realistic;
there's no blood or gore, however, one person is killed by plummeting into a raging sea,
while the turtles make light of it; the camera follows his fall. There are lots of battle
scenes with slashing swords, spears and guns. But the turtles defend themselves with their
martial arts skills, so we don't see anyone actually getting sliced. One turtle goes into
a burning building in order to save a youngster. There's a threat of torture, but nothing
happens. We do see the inside of a dungeon though, complete with prisoners in cages and
shackled to the walls.
PROFANITY 2 - No profanity, just some name calling and harsh language. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Superstition, torture, father against son, death.
MESSAGE - The explicit message is delivered by one turtle who admonishes a
young boy "to play and not to fight, unless absolutely necessary." The implicit
message, however, is that combat resolves problems more easily than play.
|
|
Special Keywords: S1 - V5 - P2 - MPAAPG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|