|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wesley Snipes stars as a gangster attempting to go
straight.
SEX/NUDITY 5 - A very brief scene in which a woman is in her underwear. One
near-rape scene (see Violence/Gore below). There are also many references to sexual acts.
VIOLENCE/GORE 7 - Lots of gunfire, but not much blood. Two women are punched
repeatedly in the face. Several dead bodies are seen in the distance. A torture scene in
which a man is burned by cigarettes -- off screen -- and then he is doused with gasoline
and set on fire. Another man is beaten and shot several times, as well as urinated on and
finally shot in the head. A woman is attacked in an attempted rape: she is pushed around,
beaten in the face and then forced to her knees to perform oral sex. Scenes of shooting up
heroin including one in which two small boys are witnesses to their mother's shooting up
and one is actually made to assist her. She goes into convulsions and dies in front of the
children. The father is beaten and shot.
PROFANITY 9 - The F-word and its variations are used repeatedly. There are
also racial slurs and insults. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Drug dealing and drug use, rape, murder, extortion, gang
violence, betrayal.
MESSAGE - One must take action to stop a cycle of violence.
|
|
Special Keywords: S5 - V7 - P9 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|