|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This horror flick has killers who kill per horror film
conventions.
SEX/NUDITY 4 - A girl flashes her boyfriend but we see her from the back. A
girl takes off her bra, preparatory to having sex, but her boyfriend blocks our view.
Fondling through clothes. Kissing. Sexual innuendo.
VIOLENCE/GORE 8 - Lots of squishy stabbings with lots and lots of blood;
people walk around with blood all over them (faces, hands, arms, torsos) from the
stabbings and knives sticking out as they stagger around. Throats are slit a couple times
in close-up with lots of blood. An eviscerated corpse sits in a chair and one is shown
hanging from a tree (lots of blood again). A bloody corpse falls onto a car windshield. A
girl is crushed in a garage door and later we see her bloody, twisted body. A few gun
shots with some blood (once in the head). A bloody knife cut on an arm and lots of hits,
kicks and punches. A car crash. A face slap resulting in a woman's bruised face. Lots of
"jump" scenes with chases, glass exploding, people jumping out. Threatening with
guns.
PROFANITY 6 - 15+ F-words, many mild obscenities, many scatological
references, and many anatomical references. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Murder and serial killers, horror films, death of a parent.
MESSAGE - Horror films may breed copycat killings.
|
|
Special Keywords: S4 - V8 - P6 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|
