|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This nearly shot-by-shot remake of Alfred Hitchcock's
1960 horror flick stars Vincent Vaughn, Anne Heche, Julianne Moore, Viggo Mortensen and
William H. Macy.
SEX/NUDITY 5 - A post-coital scene shows a man and woman in bed; we see his
bare buttocks and her in a bra. A couple is heard but not seen having sex. Movements and
sounds suggest that a man is masturbating while spying on a woman who's undressing
(we briefly see her breasts from the side). A naked woman is seen showering and the camera
lingers on a shot of her bare buttocks. We briefly see pictures of topless women in a
magazine.
VIOLENCE/GORE 6 - Two people are stabbed many times and killed -- we see
lots of blood during one murder, and some during the other. One of the murder victims
falls down a staircase. A man is hit with a golf club. During a scuffle, a man threatens a
woman with a knife, a woman kicks a man in the head, and a man hits another on the head.
We see a corpse with a spider crawling on it.
PROFANITY 0 - None. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Mental illness, murder, dysfunctional families, theft and
betrayal, remaking classic movies.
MESSAGE - Evil can be understood as the result of mental illness.
|
|
Special Keywords: S5 - V6 - P0 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|