|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A western, in the Eastwood school of movie-making, with
Mario Van Peebles as both director and star, and with a difference: most of the main
characters are African-American.
SEX/NUDITY 7 - There are shots of nude male posteriors, scenes of men
skinny-dipping, as well as of topless strippers. There's one clothed sex scene which takes
place in a saloon. While little nudity is shown (the woman lifts her skirt), there are
three participants, and they are actually carrying on a conversation with the saloon
patrons, who are watching the whole thing. There's also another very explicit sex scene
with lots of male and female nudity accompanied by groping, writhing, etc.
VIOLENCE/GORE 9 - The whole movie plays like one very long gunfight. There's
lots and lots of violence and lots of blood and gore: plenty of people are shot -- some in
slow motion -- someone is impaled, and there are explosions. One person has his eye shot
out and there's Klan violence -- a man is actually nailed onto a burning church.
PROFANITY 8 - All the typical four letter words (including the F-word and
its derivatives) are used in abundance. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Promiscuity, prostitution, gambling, betrayal, greed, murder,
prejudice and racism.
MESSAGE - African Americans made many -- usually unreported -- contributions
to the settling of the American west.
|
|
Special Keywords: S7 - V9 - P8 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|