|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A scam artist is picked to be the prey for a great white
hunter.
SEX/NUDITY 3 - Sexual innuendo (including homosexual references), kissing. A
woman's bare buttocks in thong underwear, a man's bare buttocks, a nude man in a shower --
but all we see are bare chest and legs; lather is strategically placed. We get a glimpse
of a video of two lions procreating with lots of thrusting.
VIOLENCE/GORE 4 - Lots of chases, falls, punches, hits and slaps, scuffles.
People are knocked out by a tranquilizer dart shot into them. A few people are knocked
unconscious by loud music. Some threatening with guns and people shot at a few times. A
man is hunted by two other men with guns. Decapitated "trophy" heads with
gruesome expressions and some dried blood (about a dozen heads). An explosion throws a man
many feet.
PROFANITY 3 - Some mild obscenities, a couple of anatomical references, a
few scatological references. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Hunting, bigotry and ethnic heritage, scam artists.
MESSAGE - We shouldn't use other people.
|
|
Special Keywords: S3 - V4 - P3 - MPAAPG-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|