|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rise of the Black Panther party in 1960's California is
chronicled in this film directed by Mario Van Peebles.
SEX/NUDITY 3 - A woman's cleavage is exposed, and her panties are shown when
a draft from a passing bus lifts up her skirt. There are a couple of obscene sexual
references, one obscene sexual gesture.
VIOLENCE/GORE 8 - A boy is hit by a car and he is shown lying in a pool of
blood. A man is shot several times and we see the bloody bulletholes as he's lying in
blood. Several other people are shot: one is shown in the hospital with a huge, bloody
wound on his torso. A man's finger is broken, to teach him a lesson (we hear the bone
break and the man yell). Many scenes of police brutality: police threaten crowds of people
and they viscously beat back a crowd with water and billyclubs. There are a couple of
explosions and a couple of scenes of military violence are shown in the background.
PROFANITY 9 - 50+ F-words, many racial epithets, a few obscene sexual
references, 20+ scatological terms, many milder obscenities. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Racial equality, the Black Panther party, the FBI, unethical
government practices, Vietnam.
MESSAGE - Whites cannot deny African-Americans their own history. Racial
equality has not been achieved.
|
|
Special Keywords: S3 - V8 - P9 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|