|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hugh Grant discovers the joys of fatherhood when girlfriend
Julianne Moore accidentally becomes pregnant.
SEX/NUDITY 3 - Some kisses. A woman does a little striptease for a man. He's
in his boxers and when she gets down to her slip she gets in bed and they kiss. A couple
of other pre- and post- sex scenes. Some frank, graphic talk about sex and pregnancy and
some sexual innuendo.
VIOLENCE/GORE 2 - A woman cuts her hand on a glass and we see her bloody
finger. Some slapstick stuff played for laughs. A careening car ride results in
pedestrians being hit, or nearly hit. A car is driven off the road and nearly goes under a
stationary bulldozer (no one hurt but the car is beaten up badly). Some yelling and
insults. Two men beat up a Barney-like dinosaur in a kiddie store after he insults them.
Another fist fight. Two people faint. The "violence" of giving birth (pain and
yelling) is depicted.
PROFANITY 5 - Two F-words and one derivation, 21 scatological terms, some
milder obscenities, some sexual innuendo, graphic talk about sex/pregnancy. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Pregnancy and birth, parenthood, fear of commitment,
contraception.
MESSAGE - Even an unplanned pregnancy can be a blessed event; anyone can be
a parent, but it takes someone special to be a Dad.
|
|
Special Keywords: S3 - V2 - P5 - MPAAPG-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|
