|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remake of the influential Jules Dassin film noir, with
Robert De Niro as the shyster-lawyer who "wants to be somebody."
SEX/NUDITY 4 - One sex scene in the entry way to an apartment building, no
nudity. The couple carries on a conversation about moving to California. A scantily clad
prostitute is in a lawyer's office after apparently having been arrested for solicitation,
she propositions him and grabs his private region.
VIOLENCE/GORE 3 - Two fist fights which lead to a man being thrown out of a
bar onto the street. An old man is provoked into starting a fight with a young man, and
the old man ends up having a heart attack. A woman is punched in the face by her husband.
Lots of violent threats.
PROFANITY 5 - The F-word is used several times as well as a wide range of
other profanity. Lots of name-calling. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Scamming, dishonesty, take the money and run, infidelity.
MESSAGE - The story boils down to a man's desire to make his stand and break
away from being dishonest. He is desperately trying to do something honest because he is
tired of running.
|
|
Special Keywords: S4 - V3 - P5 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|