|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rebecca DeMornay is a criminal psychologist with a stalker
problem.
SEX/NUDITY 7 - Two sex scenes: in one we see a man's chest and a woman's
breasts. The man is fondling the woman's breasts, with kissing and thrusting. The other
scene is rougher, as the couple is thrusting while standing up and splayed across a mesh
screen. Some kissing. A man's chest and buttocks are shown during a shower scene.
VIOLENCE/GORE 5 - Bloody pictures of murder victims. A mutilated cat is
briefly seen, twice. A man grabs a woman's face and shoves her roughly. A woman slaps a
man. A man is hit in the head and he bleeds. He's later seen bruised in a hospital bed. A
young girl is shown being forced to shoot a woman. A woman shoots two men resulting in
bloody wounds for both. A radiator falls into a bath causing sparks. A woman smashes a
television and later has blood on her wrists.
PROFANITY 6 - 14 F-words (one is written), some scatological references,
some mild obscenities. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Criminal psychology, multiple-personalities disorder, child
abuse, stalking.
MESSAGE - Things aren't always as they seem. You never know who to trust.
Child abuse leaves lasting scars.
|
|
Special Keywords: S7 - V5 - P6 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|