|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A group of unruly seniors get to go to Washington, D.C. to
talk about education reform with the President.
SEX/NUDITY 3 - A man fondles a woman's breasts; they fall into bed together
kissing and taking off clothes. We see his bare chest and shoulders. A vague suggestion of
a teenager performing oral sex on a school principal. A great deal of cleavage is exposed,
two girls slow dance and kiss, talk about sex and intimations that sex has occurred in a
couple of scenes, teens watch a film where teens are kissing passionately and discuss
having sex.
VIOLENCE/GORE 2 - A few car crashes (one with an explosion), a man falls off
a bus, and a man explodes in flames (but lives).
PROFANITY 5 - Four F-words, several scatological references, and some mild
obscenities. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Drugs and partying, politics and education reform.
MESSAGE - Even the school troublemakers deserve to be listened to.
|
|
Special Keywords: S3 - V2 - P5 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|
