|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A couple of surfers (Paul Walker, Steve Van Wormertry) try
to make it on land as park rangers.
SEX/NUDITY 2 - Several women are shown in revealing bikinis. A brief
passionate kiss. Sexual innuendo.
VIOLENCE/GORE 3 - Lots of scatological humor (flatulating, birds with
diarrhea). A man and woman eat worms. A man is knocked off his jet ski. A couple of
runaway trucks do some property and tree damage. Two men are aimed at with a crossbow. A
man is hit with a stone. A helicopter is fired upon. A man falls from a helicopter into
water. A man is attacked with a long spear-like object. A tense scene of some men nearly
going over a waterfall. A dangerous skateboarding scene with two man dodging traffic and
taking risks.Threatening with knives. Several explosions.
PROFANITY 2 - Several anatomical references, a couple of scatological terms,
some mild obscenities and insults. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Truancy, the surfer lifestyle, responsibility, fun vs. duty.
MESSAGE - If you're well-meaning you can always find the opportunity to do
the right thing. Stupid guys are more attractive to girls.
|
|
Special Keywords: S2 - V3 - P2 - MPAAPG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|
