|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Julia Roberts and John Malkovich redo the Dr. Jekyll/Mr.
Hyde story as seen through the eyes of housemaid Mary Reilly.
SEX/NUDITY 3 - A couple of passionate kisses and sexual innuendo. A line
drawing of a male organ. A prostitute is shown with her arms over her naked breasts. A man
rips off a woman's nightgown and licks her back.
VIOLENCE/GORE 7 - A child is beaten (we only see shadows and hear screams).
The child is then put in a closet with a rat. A child is kicked and stomped and blood is
shown on her torso. A man breaks a teacup and has a bloody gash on his hand; he pulls out
a shard of glass with his teeth. A room is drenched in blood. An eel is hacked to death,
bloody animal carcasses and organs, blood on a table. A man is holding a woman's
decapitated head with blood dripping from it. A man chases a woman. A man is beaten in the
face and head with a cane.
PROFANITY 1 - One mild obscenity. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Science, being a servant in Victorian England, child abuse,
doppelgangers.
MESSAGE - Evil may mean liberation and freedom.
|
|
Special Keywords: S3 - V7 - P1 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|