|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert De Niro is a police photographer who inadvertently
saves Bill Murray's life. Murray is a gangster and, out of gratitude sends De Niro a
"thank-you" gift: Uma Thurman. Things get complicated when De Niro and Thurman
fall in love, while Murray wants his "gift" back.
SEX/NUDITY 6 - We briefly see a naked couple through a window (twice). De
Niro and Thurman are shown necking, and then making love. Both are shown topless, and
there's passionate groping, moaning and kissing.
VIOLENCE/GORE 6 - Two men are shot inside a car: blood spatters on the
windows and upholstery. We see a number of bloody, dead bodies, throughout the movie.
Also, rather morbidly, photos of dead bodies at crime scenes decorate De Niro's apartment
(remember, he's a police photographer). There are two fist fights, complete with bloody
noses and split lips. And, a woman is punched by her lover (we don't see it, but we do
hear the noises). She ends up with a black eye.
PROFANITY 6 - Lots of F-words, as well as sexually explicit and scatological
language. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Prostitution and white-slavery, alcohol and drug abuse,
loan-sharking and murder.
MESSAGE - You must take chances and stand up to bullies. Otherwise, you have
already lost.
|
|
Special Keywords: S6 - V6 - P6 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|