|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The third installment in the "Look Who's Talking"
saga. This time, the "talking" comes from two canines.
SEX/NUDITY 3 - The opening scene depicts two dogs copulating, and we see a
stream of sperm traveling toward an egg (as in the first "Look Who's Talking").
There is a scene where Travolta gets frisky with Alley, but she discourages him. A woman
tries to seduce Travolta into having an extramarital affair. We see a lot of cleavage from
her.
VIOLENCE/GORE 3 - Two disturbing scenes of a dog fighting with one wolf, and
then with a pack of wolves. We see the dog after the fight limping and with a bloody leg.
There is a gross dream sequence in which a character imagines herself making another
character disappear by blowing on her. When she disappears, her silicone breast implants
fall to the ground.
PROFANITY 1 - One tame scatological utterance and a reference to a female
dog. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Infidelity.
MESSAGE - Have faith in those you love and who love you. Love conquers all.
People deserve a second chance.
|
|
Special Keywords: S3 - V3 - P1 - MPAAPG-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|