Become a Premium Member | Only $2 a month

► You're making sure we survive
► Exclusive previews
► No more ads


Lions for Lambs [2007] [R] - 1.5.6



Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.


Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]

Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
1 to 10


» Official Site
» IMDb Listing

Two young men whose convictions drive them to enlist in the Army are sent to the Afghan mountains as part of the first wave of a new initiative that a young senator (Tom Cruise) believes will turn the tide on the war against the Taliban. Their decision has a strong emotional impact on the professor (Robert Redford) who inspired their decision to join the military, as well as the senior reporter (Meryl Streep) who was enlisted to sell the plan to the public. Also with Michael Pena and Derek Luke. Directed by Robert Redford. [1:32]

SEX/NUDITY 1 - A young man makes a remark about a politician having a sexual encounter with a congressional page.
 Young women wear low-cut tops that reveal cleavage.

VIOLENCE/GORE 5 - Two soldiers are shot repeatedly and they slump to the ground dead.
 Troops are deployed by helicopter and fly over a snow-covered peak, they are shot at, several soldiers on-board are shot (one in the leg and we see a bloody wound, another in the face and we also see a bloody wound), and one soldier falls out of the helicopter and another jumps out after him; we see them both on the ground with injuries but they are alive, and the helicopter flies away.
 Two soldiers stranded on a snow-covered peak hear approaching enemy troops, they exchange gunfire, an air attack is launched and bombs are dropped causing large explosions around them.
 Two soldiers lying on a snow-covered peak are shown with severe wounds (one has a broken arm and fingers, one has a large bullet wound in his face, one has a broken leg and the bone and bloody tissue are exposed, and one has one leg stuck deep in the snow).
 A soldier stuck in the snow frantically digs himself out, he pulls his leg up and we hear a crack (his leg appears to be broken).
 A military commander talks about "putting our foot on their throats" during a talk about troop movement. We hear reports of soldiers being killed in bombings in Iraq.

PROFANITY 6 - 11 F-words and its derivatives, 1 obscene hand gesture, 1 sexual reference, 15 scatological terms, 2 anatomical terms, 5 mild obscenities, name-calling (idiot), 7 religious profanities, 3 religious exclamations. [profanity glossary]

SUBSTANCE USE - A man spits chewing tobacco juice into a jar.

DISCUSSION TOPICS - The Iraq War, war, politics, Vietnam, approval ratings, popularity, image, the war on terror, victory, defeat, Afghanistan, the Taliban, terrorism, guerilla warfare, diplomacy, heresy, adapting to tactics, hope, hubris, patience, "axis of evil," political science, delusions, mistakes inspired by fear, courage, fear mongering, morality, friendship, honor, honesty, responsibility, moral obligation, making change, draft, bending the public will, making a change, potential, propaganda, ambition, conscience, life choices, taking privilege for granted, the human cost of war.

MESSAGE - Ignoring the mistakes of the past lead only to a repeat of the same mistakes. The human cost of war must always be considered. If we know something is wrong it is our moral obligation to stand up and say so.

Special Keywords: S1 - V5 - P6 - MPAAR

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member

A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.

INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do



Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.


Tell all your friends: Please recommend to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.


Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.

Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.