|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Film adaptation of the classic Victor Hugo novel with Liam
Neeson and Geoffrey Rush and Valjean and Javert, respectively.
SEX/NUDITY 2 - Discussions of a woman having had sex and becoming pregnant.
References to prostitution and using sex to survive.
VIOLENCE/GORE 4 - A man is kicked several times and then beaten with rifles.
A woman is knocked to the ground and a man slaps a woman. A man smashes another man's head
against a wall. A man and woman are fired upon and a boy is shot. A woman is cut by a
sword and a woman is threatened with a gun. A gun battle leaves many people wounded or
dead; a cannon is fired into a group of people and several people are killed by firing
squad (some blood is evident). A man and a woman climb on a rooftop and nearly fall off. A
man commits suicide by drowning himself. A runaway carriage crashes.
PROFANITY 2 - One anatomical reference, several insults and mild
obscenities. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Stealing, poverty, prison, prostitution, determinism vs. free
will, unfair social and political conditions, obsessive behavior.
MESSAGE - Criminals are not born criminally inclined; they become criminals
due to poverty, hardships and society's indifference. A small act of mercy can have a
tremendously beneficial effect in someone's life.
|
|
Special Keywords: S2 - V4 - P2 - MPAAPG-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|