|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contemporary telling of the 1826 James Fenimore Cooper
novel filmed as a series of attacks, captures and rescues over mountain ridges,
white-water rapids, waterfalls and through woods.
SEX/NUDITY 2 - Some cleavage. Native American men are shown in their natural
garb of loin cloth type pants, exposing some side view behinds. A very passionate kiss
between two characters.
VIOLENCE/GORE 9 - Ultra brutal: Violence is a primary theme. Opening scene
shows a deer being tracked and killed, but reverentially. A regiment of English soldiers
is slaughtered by a Huron Indian war party, complete with bludgeonings, scalpings,
stabbings, throat slashings, and shooting. The colonial occupants of a cabin are lying
dead. Bodies are bloody and burned. One officer's heart is cut out of his chest and held
up for display. A soldier is burned at the stake; he is finally shot in the head to put
him out of his misery. A number of people end up falling off a cliff.
PROFANITY 2 - Several mild obscenities. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - War, colonization, freedom, the rule of law vs. survival.
MESSAGE - Love conquers all. He who lives by the tomahawk, often dies by the
tomahawk.
|
|
Special Keywords: S2 - V9 - P2 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|