|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A anthropologist's (Richard Dreyfuss) efforts to convince
his peers he has discovered a new tribe of aborignies gets him and his children into some
strange goings-on.
SEX/NUDITY 4 - People are shown in native garb (loin cloths, etc.), several
women are shown in cleavage revealing dresses and we see a woman's bra and cleavage.
Sexual innuendo and discussions of primitive mating rituals. Discussions of a primitive
circumcision ritual with an axe being swung at a boy's crotch. A child's drawing of a
man's genitals. It is implied that a woman grabs a man's clothed crotch. A couple is shown
in bed presumably after having had sex and a man grabs a woman's clothed breast. A man
thrusts his pelvis at another man. A man is "inspired" when he sees a woman in
native garb, but nothing happens.
VIOLENCE/GORE 2 - A monkey flatulates and a pig urinates on a person. A man
eats a grub. A woman slaps a man in the face and a woman pushes on a man's primitive
crotch cover; he reacts as if he's been hit.
PROFANITY 3 - Several scatological and anatomical references, discussions of
primitive mating rituals, and several mild obscentities. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Dysfunctional families, lying, deception, primitive cultures,
academia.
MESSAGE - Sometimes you can cheat and actually get away with it.
|
|
Special Keywords: S4 - V2 - P3 - MPAAPG-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|