|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Connery stars as a law professor defending a death row
convict who's proclaiming his innocence.
SEX/NUDITY 4 - A brief shot of a man hanging naked from his jail cell bars
(his buttocks are briefly seen in shadow). A man forces a woman's hand to his crotch. A
man threatens a woman and her daughter with rape (using veiled references).
VIOLENCE/GORE 6 - The murder and attempted rape of a young girl are
discussed throughout the film. A coroner discusses the autopsy of a child. A man is beaten
during a police interrogation. A man threatens another man with a gun in an extended,
tense scene. Autopsy photos are briefly shown (bloody gashes are evident). Two very bloody
mutilated bodies are shown. The gruesome details of electrocution are discussed in a
classroom lecture. A man is shown with a bloody knife wound on his throat. A fight scene
with threats, tackling, punching and stabbing. A man is hit with a baseball bat.
PROFANITY 7 - About 20 F-words, a large number of milder obscenities, one
scatological reference. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - The legal system, standing up for your beliefs, death
penalty, innocence and guilt, revenge.
MESSAGE - Truth is not always what it appears to be; be wary of hidden
agendas.
|
|
Special Keywords: S4 - V6 - P7 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|