Become a Premium Member | Only $2 a month

► You're making sure we survive
► Exclusive previews
► No more ads


Home Alone 2: Lost in New York



Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.


Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]

Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
1 to 10

MPAA Rating: PG

Macaulay Culkin's family again leaves him alone, this time in New York, and Joe Pesci and Daniel Stern run right into their diminutive nemesis.

SEX/NUDITY 0 - None.

VIOLENCE/GORE 3 - Culkin hits his brother while on stage at a Christmas concert. This throws all the singers off balance and the accompanist falls backwards off the stage. In the hotel, Culkin watches an old black-and-white gangster-type movie where the guy guns down his dame because he suspects she's been sleeping around. As far as the crooks are concerned, Culkin throws at least 5 bricks - all of which hit one of them in the forehead. Holes in the floor cause the crooks to fall to a cement basement. One crook gets tangled up and stapled in sensitive places - like his nose. The same crook gets electrocuted to the point of showing his skeleton. Tools fall on the other. Culkin soaks a rope in kerosene and, after climbing down it, sets it aflame - while the crooks are still hanging on to it.

PROFANITY 1 - Mildly harsh references to bodily functions. [profanity glossary]

DISCUSSION TOPICS - Escaping from prison, stealing, poverty, homelessness, prostitution.

MESSAGE - A good deed erases a bad deed. Poverty is not a crime.

Special Keywords: S0 - V3 - P1 - MPAAPG

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member

A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.

INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do



Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.


Tell all your friends: Please recommend to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.


Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.

Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.