|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drama charting social, racial and cultural differences on a
large state college campus.
SEX/NUDITY 5 - Three sex scenes, where we see bare buttocks. Homosexuality
and sexual identity are explored -- one of the sex scenes implies a lesbian relationship,
including kissing between two women. Birth control is also a topic.
VIOLENCE/GORE 7 - One attempted rape scene in which a woman asks a man to
stop because he is not wearing a condom; he refuses and becomes violent. Many fist fight
scenes in which jaws, noses and eyes are bloodied. Some display and waving around of guns.
One very violent scene in which a character shoots into a crowd, killing two people. One
victim is seen covered in blood and blood spurts from her mouth as she dies. One scene in
which a character is beaten and kicked by campus police.
PROFANITY 9 - The whole spectrum of foul language and profane terms are
employed. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Racism, sexism, premarital sex, rape, manipulation and brain
washing, homosexuality, corruption of authority.
MESSAGE - One has to find oneself before one can deal with others or the
world.
|
|
Special Keywords: S5 - V7 - P9 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|