|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A flood and an armored truck full of money collide in this
action film.
SEX/NUDITY 1 - The bottom half of a man's bare buttocks is seen. Sexual
innuendo.
VIOLENCE/GORE 7 - Some scenes of blood in water (once very bloody). Several
shootouts with several men getting shot and killed and with varying degrees of blood: A
man is shot in the throat and there's blood on his mouth and hands. A boat crashes. A man
is hit in the head with a crucifix (there's blood on forehead). Drownings and near
drownings with people smacked up against walls, buildings, etc.. A fistfight underwater. A
man is electrocuted and catches on fire. A bloody animal corpse is seen and a corpse with
bloody burns. An eye is shot out (with gushing blood). A man is hit in the face with the
butt of a gun. A woman stabs a man in the neck. A man is shot in the stomach (blood spurts
out). A man hits a pole with a thud and has a bloody mouth. A man is hit by a boat engine;
he then has very bloody hands and face. A man is shot many times (blood spurts out).
Falls, chases, scuffles, threatening with guns, electrical fires and sparks and
explosions, and crashes into glass. An attempted rape.
PROFANITY 6 - One F-word, many mild obscenities and scatological references,
some anatomical references. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Floods, armored trucks, robbery.
MESSAGE - You have to do your job and resist temptation.
|
|
Special Keywords: S1 - V7 - P6 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|