|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Written by the Ephron sisters and directed by Diane Keaton,
this is a story of three sisters (Keaton, Meg Ryan and Lisa Kudrow) facing their
father's (Walter Matthau) imminent death, their conflicting feelings about it and, as
the title suggests, the telephone. Also with Myndy Crist, Ethan Dampf, Adam Arkin, Ashley
Edner, Jesse James, Cloris Leachman, Tracee Ellis Ross and Lauren Schaffel. [1:33]
SEX/NUDITY 2 - Some sexual innuendo and an implied incestuous come-on that
turns out to be a mistake. Mild kissing. A woman wearing a slip hops out of bed with a man
when people walk in on them. We see a married, clothed couple lying in bed together. A man
tickles a woman's clothed buttocks.
VIOLENCE/GORE 1 - A character goes into a coma and soon dies. We see a car
wreck (no one gets hurt and there's no blood or gore). A man hits a woman in the face
with a balloon, a dog knocks a woman down and a man knocks over a lamp.
PROFANITY 5 - 2 F-words, several anatomical references and slang terms, a
few scatological references and many mild obscenities and insults. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Death, Alzheimer's disease, divorce, family, sisterhood,
aging, loyalty.
MESSAGE - Caring for an ailing loved one can bring the family together.
|
|
Special Keywords: S2 - V1 - P5 - MPAAPG-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|