|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Young computer hackers discover a diabolical scheme and
help save the day.
SEX/NUDITY 4 - We twice see bare male chests and shots of male buttocks (in
a non-sexual context). We briefly see a girl's nude breasts, and again through a mesh top.
There are some kissing scenes, and some sexual innuendo and references.
VIOLENCE/GORE 2 - Scenes of yelling, one fistfight, a mother slaps her child
around the head, a few scenes of cops pulling their guns on kids during an arrest and a
few car crashes.
PROFANITY 5 - One F-word and two F-word variations. 30+ scatological
references, some milder obscenities. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Computers and hacking, ecological disaster, embezzling.
MESSAGE - We deserve access to all information; there isn't anything that
can't be hacked into.
|
|
Special Keywords: S4 - V2 - P5 - MPAAPG-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|
