Grosse Pointe Blank

  
 

PLEASE HELP!

Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.

ASSIGNED NUMBERS

Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]
Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
Profanity
1 to 10

MPAA Rating: R

John Cusack is a professional hitman who returns to his hometown for his high school reunion.

SEX/NUDITY 2 - A couple kiss and she takes off her shirt but that's the end of the scene (and we don't see anything because his body blocks our view). Kissing, sexual innuendo.

VIOLENCE/GORE 7 - Two extended shoot-outs with machine gun fire where many people are shot and killed, with some blood and jerking movements as they fall (through glass, etc.). A man is shot in the abdomen and head with blood seeping out. A man is stabbed in the neck with a pen (a great deal of blood on the man's shirt and neck). A man is killed when a television is thrown on his head; his body twitches. A man's hand is cut and is very bloody. An extended fight scene with punches, kicks, tripping and throwing each other against lockers (with some blood on both men's faces). A lot of property damage and people being thrown by the force of an explosion. Threatening with guns. A man and a woman have bruised eyes. Scuffles.

PROFANITY 7 - About 25 F-words, some mild obscenities and scatological references, a few anatomical references. [profanity glossary]

DISCUSSION TOPICS - Professional hitmen, high school reunions, having a moral code, going home again.

MESSAGE - You can go home again. You have to live by a moral code.

Special Keywords: S2 - V7 - P7 - MPAAR

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member

A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.

INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do

HOW TO SUPPORT KIDS-IN-MIND

1. 

Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.

2. 

Tell all your friends: Please recommend kids-in-mind.com to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.

3. 

Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.

Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.