|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael J. Fox can talk to spirits in a small town where
Death seems to be rather active.
SEX/NUDITY 1 - Kissing, nuzzling, sexual innuendo.
VIOLENCE/GORE 7 - Scenes of ghosts haunting people: objects fly, walls
ripple and ghosts grab people; scenes of disfigured and rotting ghosts; a man has his head
shot off followed by a gush of blood, a couple of shootouts (some blood), a woman cuts her
hand; a dead woman lies in a bed splattered with her blood (blood is also splattered on
the walls), ghosts are squashed (some blood) to "death." A mass murder in a
hospital has many people shot and lying in pools of blood; bloody numbers are carved in
their foreheads. People are threatened with guns, people are strangled, when two people go
to hell there are red, writhing snakes and worms. Fistfights and scuffles resulting in
bruises and scratches.
PROFANITY 5 - One mouthed F-word, some mild obscenities, many scatological
references, many anatomical references. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Ghosts, psychic abilities.
MESSAGE - Just because you feel guilty doesn't mean you are.
|
|
Special Keywords: S1 - V7 - P5 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|