|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig (Ice Cube) loses his job and hangs out with his
friend Smoky (Chris Tucker) on a Friday afternoon.
SEX/NUDITY 3 - A couple of graphic and obscene sexual references. Two men
ogle a woman in tight clothes. A man and a woman are shown lying in bed presumably after
sex. A woman is shown with a great deal of cleavage showing and tight shorts that show the
bottom of her buttocks. A couple of men are shown in briefs.
VIOLENCE/GORE 5 - A man describes beating up on dogs. There are taunts and
threats between people. A man is hit in the face and goes flying before landing on the
ground. A man is bitten by a dog and we see his torn pants and a bandage on his buttocks.
There are many scenes of smoking pot. A man is threatened with a gun. Two people are
almost hit by a car. An extended fight scene where two people pummel each other; one ends
up with a bloody head and face. Some foot chases, and some yelling fights.
PROFANITY 10 - 50+ F-words, 40+ scatological terms, a large number of milder
obscenities, some graphic sexual references, a lot of racial slurs. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Drugs, bullying, guns & violence.
MESSAGE - Be responsible; drugs and guns aren't the answer.
|
|
Special Keywords: S3 - V5 - P10 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|