|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.B. Sweeney and Robert Patrick star in this film about
alien abduction based on the account of Travis Walton, a man who claims he was abducted by
aliens in 1975.
SEX/NUDITY 2 - No sex scenes; just some kissing between engaged and married
couples. The main character is stripped when being examined by aliens, but we only see his
clothes being torn off. Later, however, after being dropped off by the aliens, he is found
nude (we mostly see him in the fetal position).
VIOLENCE/GORE 5 - A couple of fist fights, no blood is drawn. One character
threatens another with a buzz saw. Some scenes in which the aliens are examining the lead
character are violent and disturbing: he is chased, captured, stripped and then subjected
to a variety of experiments with needles and clamps (he actually takes a needle in the eye
-- a hard scene to watch).
PROFANITY 2 - Some mild swearing. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - This realistic portrayal of abduction by aliens may be very
disturbing for small children, and it's bound to bring up the question of our existence in
the universe. Honesty, trust, hatred, jealousy, and the fear of the unknown and how it
effects people.
MESSAGE - Aliens do exist and they're not benevolent E.T.'s. Friendship is
very important.
|
|
Special Keywords: S2 - V5 - P2 - MPAAPG-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|