Fear

 
 

PLEASE HELP!

Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.



ASSIGNED NUMBERS

Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]


Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
Profanity
1 to 10

MPAA Rating: R

Reese Witherspoon endangers herself and her family when she begins a relationship with psycho Mark Wahlberg.

SEX/NUDITY 6 - A brief glimpse of naked women in a magazine, sexual innuendo, brief fondling through clothes, a man caresses a woman under her skirt as she sighs and moans, lots of passionate kissing. A woman is sitting on her boyfriend's lap gyrating, her nearly bare buttocks (she's wearing a thong) are seen. A man and woman have sex: he pulls her underwear off, we see his bare chest and we see them kissing and thrusting.

VIOLENCE/GORE 8 - A nightclub brawl. A man viciously hits a woman resulting in a black eye, a man chases a boy and breaks his neck, a man is thrown out a window amidst breaking glass and lands with a thud (some blood in his mouth). A couple of other people are beaten up. A drill through someone's hand (a little blood), the bloody head of a dog is thrown into a house, a man is shot point-blank in the head, a man is run over by a car. Some yelling scenes, lots of property damage and threats.

PROFANITY 8 - About 20 F-words, many scatological references, some mild obscenities and anatomical references. [profanity glossary]

DISCUSSION TOPICS - Teenage dating, sociopaths, obsession.

MESSAGE - Know someone well before you begin a relationship with him.

Special Keywords: S6 - V8 - P8 - MPAAR

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member


A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.




INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do



HOW TO SUPPORT KIDS-IN-MIND

1. 

Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.

2. 

Tell all your friends: Please recommend kids-in-mind.com to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.

3. 

Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.





Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.