Exit to Eden

  
 

PLEASE HELP!

Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.

ASSIGNED NUMBERS

Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]
Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
Profanity
1 to 10

MPAA Rating: R

Sex-farce about a resort where sexual fantasies become reality. With Dana Delany, Dan Aykroyd and Rosie O'Donnell.

SEX/NUDITY 9 - Full female frontal nudity is depicted twice; nude breasts are exposed numerous times. Both men and women are shown scantily clad throughout the film. A man is shown bathing a woman, a couple is shown having sex and oral sex is implied. There are references to sadomasochism and discussions of sexual fantasies throughout. A man is shown tied up and blindfolded, while a woman is shown spanking and taunting him.

VIOLENCE/GORE 4 - Two women fight in a rest room, and one chokes the other with a string of pearls. Two women have a fight and wrestle on the floor, with kicking and punching; one is knocked out with a punch. Two men fight and a woman is thrown through a window and almost falls over a balcony. A woman is stabbed in the hand, and a man is shot twice and falls off a balcony.

PROFANITY 1 - There's very little profanity (one anatomical reference, and one scatological term -- in French) but there are sexual discussions throughout, as well as discussions of female hygiene and the female reproductive system. [profanity glossary]

DISCUSSION TOPICS - Sexual fantasies, sadomasochism, control.

MESSAGE - Love means sharing control. True love is the ultimate fantasy.

Special Keywords: S9 - V4 - P1 - MPAAR

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member

A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.

INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do

HOW TO SUPPORT KIDS-IN-MIND

1. 

Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.

2. 

Tell all your friends: Please recommend kids-in-mind.com to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.

3. 

Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.

Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.