|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kathy Bates stars as a Maine mother and wife who may have
killed her husband several years ago, and may have killed her employer just last week.
SEX/NUDITY 5 - Some vague talk about incest and a scene where a father
coaxes his 13-year-old daughter into touching his clothed crotch. She begins caressing him
while he leans into her and sighs and moans. A man is shown in his underpants.
VIOLENCE/GORE 5 - A struggle at the top of some stairs results in an elderly
lady tumbling down; she is shown with a bloody mouth. A woman wrecks a kitchen looking for
a weapon. Local kids taunt a woman and vandalize her house. A man hits a woman in the back
with a two by four. A woman hits a man in the head and his head bleeds. The man and woman
threaten each other with death as one holds an ax. He chases her, drags her down and tries
to choke her. A young girl cuts her neck leaving bloody marks. A man falls into a well.
PROFANITY 5 - 9 F-words, 15 scatological terms, a lot of milder obscenities;
some obscene graffiti. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Spousal abuse, incest, revenge, mother/daughter
relationships.
MESSAGE - Some parents will do anything to protect their children.
|
|
Special Keywords: S5 - V5 - P5 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|