|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nancy Travis and Dylan McDermott spend eternity together --
with a little help from a god called Destiny (Quentin Tarantino).
SEX/NUDITY 3 - Showgirls are shown, from behind with only G-strings on. A
man is shown nude, with a strategically placed table hiding his private parts. A dancer is
shown in a bra. A man and woman are shown under a blanket, presumably after sex, with
exposed shoulders. A woman is shown in a bubble bath (only naked shoulders seen). A man
and woman fall into bed kissing and hugging. Several passionate kissing scenes. A man
keeps grabbing his clothed crotch. And there are several sexual references but they are
not graphic or lewd.
VIOLENCE/GORE 3 - There are a few near car crashes. A few fights, some with
yelling and wild gestures; some involve throwing things. A man is hit in the face twice,
and another gets a knee to the groin. A man is hit by lightning a few times. A motorcycle
blows up. Men are hit in the head with a shoe and a billy club and knocked unconscious. A
man is threatened with a gun.
PROFANITY 5 - 8 F-words, 9 scatological terms, many milder obscenities, and
some sexual references. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - True love, prison, the supernatural.
MESSAGE - True love is worth any price.
|
|
Special Keywords: S3 - V3 - P5 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|