|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A policeman's son is in need of a bone marrow transplant,
and an escaped con is the only match. With Andy Garcia and Michael Keaton.
SEX/NUDITY 1 - Sexual innuendo and threats.
VIOLENCE/GORE 8 - A man breaks his own finger. A man is shot in the leg and
we see the very bloody wound. A man stitches his wounded leg. Several people are set on
fire. People are threatened with a scalpel. Several people are shot and some are killed. A
man is shot in the head and blood spurts out of the wound. Morgue shots show organs and
body parts in jars. Pictures of murder victims are shown briefly. Several people are
punched and knocked around with heavy objects. A man crashes through glass on a
motorcycle. A man is threatened with a needle full of acid. Cars are crushed by falling
debris. A helicopter is fired upon. A man is shown with a burned face. A couple of
explosions.
PROFANITY 6 - About 20 F-words, a handful of scatological terms, a few
anatomical references and several mild obscenities and insults. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Terminal illness, medical treatments, psychotic behavior,
desperation.
MESSAGE - A parent can go to extreme and unwaranted ends to find a cure for
his child.
|
|
Special Keywords: S1 - V8 - P6 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|