|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two policemen try to break down a murder suspect. Tim Roth,
Michael Rooker.
SEX/NUDITY 4 - Discussions of sex (including homosexuality). A man and woman
attempt to have sex. A woman attempts to seduce a man. A woman in a peep show is shown in
her bra. A sex scene with no visible nudity but brief sexual movements.
VIOLENCE/GORE 7 - A man has a seizure. A woman is murdered and cut in half
(this act is hidden by a bathtub, but his bloody hands are seen). A suggestion that a rape
occurred. A flashback of a man stabbing a woman in the chest. Some objects are thrown
around: a glass against a wall, and a heavy object through a window. A man is punched and
kicked resulting in a bloody mouth and some scratches. A man beat a woman up. A woman is
suffocated with a pillow. A man plays a game of Russian roulette. A man knocks his head
when he falls. A description of a man flaying himself. A bloody knife is shown.
Threatening with guns.
PROFANITY 7 - A couple of dozen F- words and a profane hand gesture, many
scatological terms, several anatomical references and many mild obscenities and insults. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Psychopathy, deception, Epilepsy.
MESSAGE -
|
|
Special Keywords: S4 - V7 - P7 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|