Deceiver

 
 

PLEASE HELP!

Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.



ASSIGNED NUMBERS

Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]


Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
Profanity
1 to 10

MPAA Rating: R

Two policemen try to break down a murder suspect. Tim Roth, Michael Rooker.

SEX/NUDITY 4 - Discussions of sex (including homosexuality). A man and woman attempt to have sex. A woman attempts to seduce a man. A woman in a peep show is shown in her bra. A sex scene with no visible nudity but brief sexual movements.

VIOLENCE/GORE 7 - A man has a seizure. A woman is murdered and cut in half (this act is hidden by a bathtub, but his bloody hands are seen). A suggestion that a rape occurred. A flashback of a man stabbing a woman in the chest. Some objects are thrown around: a glass against a wall, and a heavy object through a window. A man is punched and kicked resulting in a bloody mouth and some scratches. A man beat a woman up. A woman is suffocated with a pillow. A man plays a game of Russian roulette. A man knocks his head when he falls. A description of a man flaying himself. A bloody knife is shown. Threatening with guns.

PROFANITY 7 - A couple of dozen F- words and a profane hand gesture, many scatological terms, several anatomical references and many mild obscenities and insults. [profanity glossary]

DISCUSSION TOPICS - Psychopathy, deception, Epilepsy.

MESSAGE -

Special Keywords: S4 - V7 - P7 - MPAAR

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member


A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.




INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do



HOW TO SUPPORT KIDS-IN-MIND

1. 

Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.

2. 

Tell all your friends: Please recommend kids-in-mind.com to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.

3. 

Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.





Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.