|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A group of men (and one woman) plan an armored truck heist
in post-Vietnam America.
SEX/NUDITY 4 - Some kissing, sexual references, a man and a woman are in bed
together, obviously naked although we see no nudity; they kiss and then we see them having
sex. A man is shown with a severed penis in his mouth.
VIOLENCE/GORE 9 - Vietnam scenes: fighting, explosions, bloody wounds and
death; the most graphic scenes show a few severed body parts, a man whacks off an enemy's
head and then carries it around, a man has his intestines ripped out of his body and a man
has his own severed penis stuck in his mouth. A man has nightmares which consist of
rotting corpses, severed, bloody heads (it's very gross). There is a shoot-out where many
people are shot and killed (with lots of blood). Several people are shot point-blank in
the head, with blood spurting out. A man shoots cops through a windshield. A man is hit by
a car and then smashes up against a wall while a puddle of blood forms around his head. A
few scenes of people fighting which result in bloody mouths and faces.
PROFANITY 9 - 40+ F-words, many scatological references, many mild
obscenities, many anatomical references. A great deal of racial epithets. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - The Vietnam war, racism, unwed motherhood, black revolution.
MESSAGE - We owe Vietnam veterans more than what they received when the war
ended.
|
|
Special Keywords: S4 - V9 - P9 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|