|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rufus Sewell and Kiefer Sutherland star in the story of a
man who does battle with an alien race in order to get his real memories and his life
back.
SEX/NUDITY 6 - A man's bare buttocks are seen several times. A corpse's bare
breasts are seen several times. A woman is shown undressing, exposing her breasts,
buttocks and there's a quick glimpse of full frontal nudity.
VIOLENCE/GORE 8 - We see a bloody corpse. A man is hanged. A man is
threatened with a knife, and a man is shoved into a wall. An alien's head is split open
(during a very bloody scene), and a tentacled creature crawls out of it. A man jumps in
front a subway train. A corpse is shown with bloody cuts on her chest. An alien is crushed
by a building (another very bloody scene) and an alien is impaled. A man is bitten in the
hand by a creature. A person's throat is slit and some blood is seen on a woman's throat
after being scratched by a knife. Some aliens are shot. Several telekinetic fights take
place with people and objects being knocked and tossed around. A blood covered man is
shown. A man injects himsef and people are shown being injected in the forehead with a
huge syringe. Threatening with guns.
PROFANITY 2 - A handful of mild obscenities. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Aliens, mind control, telekinisis, the permanency of
memories, being human.
MESSAGE - The future of the human race could be very bleak.
|
|
Special Keywords: S6 - V8 - P2 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|