|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sequel to "The Crow" has Vincent Perez as a
man who dies and comes back from death to set wrongs right.
SEX/NUDITY 7 - Sexual innuendo, two women are engaging in S&M: in
bondage leather and one drips hot wax on the other while she writhes. We see many bare
breasts, an orgy has people having sex standing up (mostly while clothed). A man
masturbates in a peepshow.
VIOLENCE/GORE 9 - A man and boy are shot to death by a crowd (we see this
scene in flashback many times). Explosions, falls, rioting, people shot with guns --
sometimes multiple times. A man is injected up his nose (offscreen), a man is drilled in
the eye (offscreen), a man's eyes are squeezed out (offscreen) and we later see his
bloody, eyeless corpse. Fistfights and beatings which sometimes result in blood. Men are
impaled a couple of times, a man is nearly hung, various stabbings, martial arts fighting.
A woman's back is audibly broken and she's then thrown out a window and becomes a puddle
of blood. A crow is tortured to death and lays in a pool of blood. A man dies while
engulfed in flames.
PROFANITY 7 - 25+ F-words, many scatological references, a few mild
obscenities and anatomical references. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Death, revenge, S&M.
MESSAGE - Love and the desire for revenge can even survive death.
|
|
Special Keywords: S7 - V9 - P7 - MPAAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|