Become a Premium Member | Only $2 a month

► You're making sure we survive
► Exclusive previews
► No more ads


Conspiracy Theory



Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.


Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]

Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
1 to 10

MPAA Rating: R

Mel Gibson is a man who sees a governmental conspiracy in everything and Julia Roberts is the Justice Department attorney to whom he tells his secrets.

SEX/NUDITY 1 - Kissing.

VIOLENCE/GORE 6 - Some people are shot; a couple are shown with blood on their chest and torso. People are pistol-whipped a few times. A man is hit in the face with a steel rail, another with a steel chair. A crotch kick. A man is held underwater in a couple of scenes. A couple of men are shot in the water -- with lots of blood. A man is tortured with strobe lights (eyes taped open and injections). A man bites another's nose -- there's a lot of blood. A man falls down steps in a wheelchair and part of the chair pokes through his side with blood shown on his stomach. A man is pushed through glass and falls. Throughout the film a man has a bloody, cut nose. A man has blood on his chest and face and a woman has blood on her hands. Explosions, falls, chases, reckless driving, a few scuffles, threatening with guns.

PROFANITY 5 - Two F-words. Some scatological and anatomical references. Many mild obscenities. [profanity glossary]

DISCUSSION TOPICS - Conspiracies, government, the Justice Department, assassinations.

MESSAGE - Nothing is as it seems.

Special Keywords: S1 - V6 - P5 - MPAAR

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member

A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.

INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do



Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.


Tell all your friends: Please recommend to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.


Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.

Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.