Coneheads

  
 

PLEASE HELP!

Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.

ASSIGNED NUMBERS

Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]
Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
Profanity
1 to 10

MPAA Rating: PG

Dan Aykroyd and Jane Curtin are the alien Conehead parental units, trying to raise their young one (Michelle Burke) while realizing the American Dream. Based on characters created by NBC's Saturday Night Live.

SEX/NUDITY 4 - One full shot of naked male bottoms in the shower, including a conehead's (theirs looks different), and some cleavage. There are a couple of necking scenes -- between humans, conehead and conehead and conehead and human -- and a suggested sex scene between conehead and human teen (nothing is shown). A seduction scene, leading to sex, which is only heard through surveillance equipment. A conehead gives birth. Condoms are used as chewing gum. Discussion of birds and the bees.

VIOLENCE/GORE 5 - There's a battle between a monster and two men: both end up dead, and we see a severed leg and head. Some shoving, pushing and some gross-out scenes: the coneheads eat toilet paper, fiberglass insulation, drink window cleaner, and even bite on an umbilical cord (off-screen).

PROFANITY 3 - Some scatological and anatomical references. Some profanities in incomprehensible Remulakian (the conehead's native tongue). [profanity glossary]

DISCUSSION TOPICS - Fraud, illegal immigrants, alien life, teen sex.

MESSAGE - A happy family is everything.

Special Keywords: S4 - V5 - P3 - MPAAPG

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member

A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.

INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do

HOW TO SUPPORT KIDS-IN-MIND

1. 

Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.

2. 

Tell all your friends: Please recommend kids-in-mind.com to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.

3. 

Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.

Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.