|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The inmates of a small British chicken farm are anxious to
find a way out before they become the ingredients of chicken pies. The film follows their
leader Ginger (voiced by Julia Sawalha) and Rocky the Rooster (voiced by Mel Gibson) as
they lead their fellow chickens to freedom from the clutches and the hatchet of Mrs.
Tweedy (voiced by Miranda Richardson). This is the first full-length feature from
clay-animator Nick Park, creator of the Wallace and Gromit shorts. Also with the voices of
Jane Horrocks, Timothy Spall, Lynn Ferguson, Benjamin Whitrow, Tony Haygarth and Phil
Daniels. [1:35]
SEX/NUDITY 1 - Some flirting and hand-touching among poultry, and remarks
from a rooster about "chicks." Several chickens want a rooster to share their
bed. A beak-to-beak kiss between a chicken and a rooster.
VIOLENCE/GORE 4 - A couple of very mean-looking dogs track a chicken who's
trying to escape from a coup; they are growling and snarling and we see them in a couple
of scenes. A rooster crashes into a feed trough resulting in a sprained wing; he wears a
sling for part of the movie. A turnip explodes when it hits a wall illustrating what might
happen to a chicken. A chicken knits a noose. A chicken crashes into a fence and is flung
back landing on two mice. A very loud and scary-looking chicken-pie machine is brought to
the farm. A chicken is strapped onto the machine, and falls down a huge chute toward some
whirring blades; a chicken and rooster approach a huge roller which is shown squishing
dough, and they are nearly cut by a pie crust cutter. Eventually they are nearly trapped
in a flaming oven. The rooster falls into several pie crusts filled with presumably hot
gravy and is slapped hard with a sticker. A woman is sprayed with a stream of gravy. Some
shoving leads to a pile-on fight among chickens. A rooster knocks a chicken in the head
with a stick and a bunk bed falls on a chicken. A chicken slaps a rooster's face. A
chicken is taken to a shed to be killed and we hear the "thud" of the falling
hatchet; we don't see anything but the other chickens look very frightened. There's also
talk of killing chickens to make money. A very threatening-looking, angry woman is present
throughout the movie. She insults, and kicks a man in the bottom. She also swings a
hatchet at a chicken. The hatchet is knocked out of her hand and lands nearly hitting the
woman's head. In hatchet-swinging instance we get the impression that the chicken lost her
head but we soon realize that she's fine (she does look beheaded for a long moment). A
woman hangs from a rope dangling from a flying plane. She is pelted in the face with raw
eggs. A woman falls from a plane and lands in machinery which promptly explodes and leaves
her blackened. A wall of a building collapses onto a woman. Chickens are propelled in the
air by various means, often landing roughly. A man is attacked, bound and gagged by
chickens. A rooster lands onto a woman with his tricycle.
PROFANITY 1 - Several insults and name calling, and one anatomical
reference. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Freedom,
concentration and POW camps,
killing chickens, chicken farms, cruelty, teamwork,
perseverance, trust and honesty, heroism.
MESSAGE - The grass may indeed be greener on the other side. Working
together as a team makes any effort possible.
|
|
Special Keywords: S1 - V4 - P1 - MPAAG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|