|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Borrowers are tiny humans (about 4 inches tall) who
live under the floorboards of our houses and borrow stuff from us. With John Goodman.
SEX/NUDITY 0 - None, really, unless you count a budding teen romance.
VIOLENCE/GORE 3 - Many, many scenes of the Borrowers in peril and even
mortal danger: A Borrower girl gets trapped in a freezer, then she and her dad almost get
squished by ice from a dispenser; four Borrowers and lots of stuff are sucked up from
floorboards by a vacuum; a Borrower girl and boy fall from a truck, the boy lands in dog
doo and then the truck runs over him. Borrowers almost get hammered to death, stepped on,
electrocuted, drowned in milk, and there's an exterminator and who tries to do away with
them by spraying foam into the walls where they are hiding. While there's no gore, there's
a scene where a man is covered in chemicals and we anticipate that he will be disfigured
(he survives almost intact). A man is tied up.
PROFANITY 1 - Some mild insults and name calling. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - Greed, lying, vanity, borrowing vs. stealing.
MESSAGE - Never judge people by how small they seem to be. Being part of a
team is better than being alone.
|
|
Special Keywords: S0 - V3 - P1 - MPAAPG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|