|
| |
|
PLEASE HELP! Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please
donate or
become a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSIGNED NUMBERS |
|
|
Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context. |
|
[more »] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Keaton reprises his role as the caped crusader. The
plot sets The Penguin (Danny DeVito) as an embittered half-human, half-penguin creature
out to control Gotham and destroy Batman, with the help of Christopher Walken as a Gotham
power broker and Michelle Pfeiffer as a leather-and-whips, man-hating machine dubbed the
Catwoman.
SEX/NUDITY 2 - None, though the Penguin gets a bit descriptive about his
base desires. Also, that's no barrel the Catwoman is wearing. At one instance the Catwoman
licks Batman's face. Keaton and Pfeiffer roll on his couch, kissing passionately, but
nothing else happens.
VIOLENCE/GORE 4 - Lots of explosions, people are dropped out of high
buildings as a matter of course, there are some razor slashes and shootings, comic book
beatings. A severed hand. A charred corpse is quite visible.
PROFANITY 2 - A few relatively mild expletives. [profanity glossary]
DISCUSSION TOPICS - An argument could be made for the value of mental health
counselling: All masked characters in the film are presented as emotionally dysfunctional.
MESSAGE - Crime does not pay.
|
|
Special Keywords: S2 - V4 - P2 - MPAAPG-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process. |
|
|
|
|