Become a Premium Member | Only $2 a month

► You're making sure we survive
► Exclusive previews
► No more ads


Batman and Robin



Although our site is very popular, the current economic climate has reduced our revenues just when we need extra security to prevent attacks from hackers who don't like what we do. If you think what we do is worthwhile, please donate or become a member.


Unlike the MPAA we do not assign one inscrutable rating based on age, but 3 objective ratings for SEX/NUDITY, VIOLENCE/GORE and PROFANITY on a scale of 0 to 10, from lowest to highest, depending on quantity and context.

 [more »]

Sex & Nudity
Violence & Gore
1 to 10

MPAA Rating: PG-13

The caped crusader is back battling villains Poison Ivy and Mr. Freeze. George Clooney puts on the spandex this time out. Also with Arnold Schwarzenegger, Chris O'Donnell, Uma Thurman and Alicia Silverstone.

SEX/NUDITY 2 - Scantily clad women. Kissing, sexual innuendo.

VIOLENCE/GORE 5 - Venom is squirted into a man's skull as he twitches and convulses; his body bulks up and veins pop out. A man's tongue swells and turns black as he dies. Screams from the background as people die during experiments. A couple of corpses with black mouths and engorged veins. Many fight scenes with no blood but with kicking, punching, twirling and people being thrown around and hit with objects. A scene with people being shot at. A man is choked. A man is thrown many feet into a glass case, another man is thrown and falls with an audible thud. A man is kicked in the face. Many people are frozen. A person is attacked by plants. A man shrinks to death. An explosion. Threatening with guns and chases. Reckless motorcycle riding.

PROFANITY 3 - Some mild obscenities. [profanity glossary]

DISCUSSION TOPICS - Family, trust, battling evil, heroism.

MESSAGE - Good always wins. Family above all.

Special Keywords: S2 - V5 - P3 - MPAAPG-13

Our Ratings Explained

Tell Friends About Our Site

Become a Member

A CAVEAT: We've gone through several editorial changes since we started covering films in 1992 and some of our early standards were not as stringent as they are now. We therefore need to revisit many older reviews, especially those written prior to 1998 or so; please keep this in mind if you're consulting a review from that period. While we plan to revisit and correct older reviews our resources are limited and it is a slow, time-consuming process.

INAPPROPRIATE ADS? We have little control over ads since we belong to ad agencies that serve ads automatically; a standing order should prevent provocative ads, but inappropriate ads do sneak in.
What you can do



Become a member: You can subscribe for as little as a couple of dollars a month and gain access to our premium site, which contains no ads whatsoever. Think about it: You'll be helping support our site and guarantee that we will continue to publish, and you will be able to browse without any commercial interruptions.


Tell all your friends: Please recommend to your friends and acquaintances; you'll be helping them by letting them know how useful our site is, while helping us by increasing our readership. Since we do not advertise, the best and most reliable way to spread the word is by word-of-mouth.


Alert local & national media: Let major media know why you trust our ratings. Call or e-mail a local newspaper, radio station or TV channel and encourage them to do a story about our site. Since we do not have a PR firm working for us, you can be our media ambassadors.

Copyright © 1992- Critics. All rights reserved. "Kids-In-Mind™" and "Movie Ratings That Actually Work™" are Service Marks of Critics. For legal queries please see our Terms of Use; for comments or questions see our contact page.